Another great piece by you... by the way, that was sarcasm, feel free to write an essay about it. I doubt it's any kind of bioweapon, every disease originates from there.

Interesting given that during the cold war the US did test biological weapons in cities like New York (I think, Minnesota maybe too, but I don't quite remember)

experimenting with different viruses. However I think SARS is much more hype than bite. Consider the following, SARS has only killed 76 people in Hong Kong, how bad is a virus that only kills 76 people in a population as dense as Hong Kong?

Having said that (perhaps something I will write about later) SARS is a biological weapon of sorts, however, its not the victims of SARS that are targets...its precisely the people that haven't been contracted it that are the targets, and I do not think that any administrative body is responsible

for its outbreak.

"Politics is War by other means", Michel Foucaul, ' "Society must be defended' "

Well, China is certainly being obstructive in terms of covering up the extent of SARS in the country. But then that's par for the course - China took years to admit to having an AIDS problem as well. So, intriguing as your hypothesis is, I doubt it's actually true.

Good job I liked it. Please read my stories The Legend of the Red DIamond and THe Last Grand Duchesses of Russia.