 Keith Andrew 2004-12-11 . chapter 1Okay not sure if i agree with this. It would have been very good a coulple of hundred years ago but since newton and a whole pile of other scientists put forward. theories covered both gravity and magnetism, which are in fact two seperate phenonema, no matter how alike they seem. But this was well written. A fun piece of science fistion if anything-Keith Andrew |
 Dark Angel of Music 2004-05-30 . chapter 1 I'm not entirely sure whether or not you're being facetious, but gravity and magnetism, though possibly related, are most definitely not exactly the same concept. Gravity is not merely the attraction of a smaller body to a larger one; rather it is a pull BETWEEN two bodies, and it exists between any two bodies there are; the effect is simply too weak to be noticeable between small bodies. Magnetism, on the other hand, is not merely about attraction and repullsion. The magnetic field is also closely tied with the electric field, a relationship which human beings have been making use of for years now in various devices (such as the computer I'm now typing this on).
I do, however, like the idea of waves being utilized at varying frequencies, and it is possible that we should explore the possibility that such phenomena are already taking place, unnoticed. It might grant us some new insights into how to manipulate the phenomena. :) |
 Anarchist Smurfette 2003-12-31 . chapter 1Interesting... I'm not sure quite how serious you're being with this, but magnetism is nothing to do with small objects being drawn to big objects. In fact, you can use a powerful magnet to pick up a much larger object. And IO think connecting magnetism and gravity involves string theory. Possibly. It's one of those area's we still don't know everything about. |