LMAO you've got a lot of people heated in your writings and I dig it. People need to stop being so passionate, this leads to way TOO MUCH conflict. Meh.

I particularly liked the first bit and laughed most about dubbya, gay, K, and blacks. It's twisted, I quite liked it. You're quickly becoming a favorite of mine deary.

Jenna xoxo

Yes, it's completely biased, kinda childish, and the ones written by republicans about liberals really piss me off. But I don't care, I laughed my arse off! For shame!

-

Especially love: "Rich people’s posterity – worth more than the poor, and too valuable to go to war." and "George Bush – A great guy with a great cabinet! Is there any more to say? Oh yeah,

nuc-u-lar" he he he

Why is this under humor if its not funny...well except for this line "I do recognize that some of these views are still biased, but I believe they are all together more realistic." Don't become a comedian.

Savage

"Capitalism – one man obtains luxury at the expense of another man’s suffering and inferiority (economically). This is a good thing, for Americans are civilized and developed."

what do you suggest instead?

"I do recognize that some of these views are still biased, but I believe they are all together more realistic."

lol!

So true... unfortunately. I think very low of my chances of surviving the next four years with W. as president.

"Republican conception is incredibly biased"

(sarcastically) Yeah, those Republicans are so biased.

Buttholes! Excellent.

The point of satire is to be subtle, not to beat someone over the head with it. Otherwise it loses all meaning and humor.

This is a prime example of that.

Calvin Fitzgerald

To all viewers: "I read the original, could this possibly be worse! Well sequels usually do suck," along with "This remains as inanely overdone as the first time you posted it..." are misconceptions; the only thing I changed from the original "guidelines of republicanism" is the language. Thus, this is not a sequel and elementarily has had nothing done to alter it.- Holocaustpulp

An interesting little essay. Clear and to the point. A good summary of the republican platitudes. I think you could write a good essay using any of the things you mentioned. The only major flaw of this is that it lacks a clear thesis, and therefore, comes out as more of a scattergun affect. Try a nice, well organized essay, it'll peirce like the sharpest of blades.

Wow Stein, when are you gonna stop ripping off Lord of the Rings in your lame-arse reveiws? I wasn't funny the first time, or the second or the third or the...

"And an essay saying: "I'M NOT A LIBERAL! GA A A AH! STUPID REPUBLICANZES!" is an example of utter genius"

Dude, I explained that essay in its own reveiw section.

I find it hilarious that you call my works boring and imply that they are not the work of intelligence. I am yet to see originality spew from your mouth, whilst I do seem to get quite a few reveiws...

Cthulhu, you're right. Boring talks about the non-existence of the deity and the dearth of evidence for his actuality is far more entertaining. And an essay saying: "I'M NOT A LIBERAL! GA A A AH! STUPID REPUBLICANZES!" is an example of utter genius.

The note at the end made me laugh. Wasn't as funny as it could have been, but still pretty right on most stuff...like the michael moore thing!

OM

I'm with Flames. This remains as inanely overdone as the first time you posted it, and it mostly plays on stereotypes that are too absurd to be funny.

*chuckles*

the Catholic thing miffed me a bit...but i loved the other stuff.

ciao.

Not very well done, but I dont think that Steiny can criticise it much seeing as his "Guidelines of Liberalism" was no less crap.