Home Just In Communities Forums Beta Readers Dictionary Search Login Register Extras
Reviews For: Crucified on the podium
NejikeruAme 2006-08-11 . chapter 1
i felt that you kind of jumped around a lot. you were on one subjact and then just jumped to another. also i disagree that there is no justice. the people that have either the power or the money often sway the others with the final athority. yet again i dod agree that it is not right that this is so. the church dose get an awful lot of leeway in the judiciary system, and that they get away with entierly too much. i also find that they tend to be biased desisions as well whitch also causes more problems where they could be avoided from a lack of pity.
Roth Jopalse Sammuels 2005-06-09 . chapter 1
I found what you wrote a bit confusing, but I kind of see your point. I believe that the main problem is not Church versus State but the simple fact that our court system just isn't working. Justice isn't blind, but the main issue isn't religion. The main issue is the fact that a verdict can be bought and oppinion can be swayed and doubt can always be raised... if you have the money to do so that is. Yes, a judge can always feel sympathy if he is of the same religion as someone put on trial before him, but bias in general causes the problem. That little hammer the judge swings down needs to come down a little harder and with less mercy for the animals of this world. But as long as biased judges and a system prone to error stands, this issue will never be solved. It's one of the issues I cover in a work of my own which is coming out soon. It's called The Roth Oracle. I recommend it. And it's not egotistical, Roth isn't even my real name. But anyway, try to put more work into what you've written and don't be so wordy because it makes it confusing.
d'Neronique 2005-06-08 . chapter 1
How incoherent of you. I'm pretty sure you're against church in state, a lot of your arguments and statements were pretty ambiguous.

I highly disagree with your idea of Jusice as equality. There IS such thing as justice, its just impossible for us to know it. I think I get your poinst: As policy approaches equality, it is getting close to justice, but never quite reaches it. Damn justice asymptote. But you didn't do much to support that idea.

I hate your last paragraph the most. You have ADD.
Return to Top