 Roth Jopalse Sammuels 2005-06-09 . chapter 1I found what you wrote a bit confusing, but I kind of see your point. I believe that the main problem is not Church versus State but the simple fact that our court system just isn't working. Justice isn't blind, but the main issue isn't religion. The main issue is the fact that a verdict can be bought and oppinion can be swayed and doubt can always be raised... if you have the money to do so that is. Yes, a judge can always feel sympathy if he is of the same religion as someone put on trial before him, but bias in general causes the problem. That little hammer the judge swings down needs to come down a little harder and with less mercy for the animals of this world. But as long as biased judges and a system prone to error stands, this issue will never be solved. It's one of the issues I cover in a work of my own which is coming out soon. It's called The Roth Oracle. I recommend it. And it's not egotistical, Roth isn't even my real name. But anyway, try to put more work into what you've written and don't be so wordy because it makes it confusing. |
 d'Neronique 2005-06-08 . chapter 1How incoherent of you. I'm pretty sure you're against church in state, a lot of your arguments and statements were pretty ambiguous.
I highly disagree with your idea of Jusice as equality. There IS such thing as justice, its just impossible for us to know it. I think I get your poinst: As policy approaches equality, it is getting close to justice, but never quite reaches it. Damn justice asymptote. But you didn't do much to support that idea.
I hate your last paragraph the most. You have ADD. |