| Home Just In Communities Forums Beta Readers Dictionary Search | Login Register Extras |
It's pretty hard for anyone to lose someone you love. A funeral is
never a funeral without someone crying, lamenting, or being unusually
quiet. Death is usually associated with sadness and grief. A saying goes,
'we grieve not for the dead, but for us. We should be happy for them as
they are now in a happier place.' Personally, I think this saying holds a
lot of truth. We should be happy for those who have passed on. This brings
us to a more complicated question: 'If we should be happy for those who
have passed on, then do we have the right to be the cause of their
passing?'
I personally do not believe that anyone has the right to take away
another's life for any reason whatsoever. No matter what condition he is
in, we were not meant to decide when or where a person has to die. As the
fifth commandment states, 'Thou shall not kill.' Death should never have to
be an option.
This leads to a rather ironic realization. Man is known for being the
only being that kills his own kind for no reason whatsoever. Man is also
known as the only being who can actually stop or prevent death.
It seems that our medical marvels have made us rather arrogant, in a
way. We have conquered disease after disease after disease, and we have
made our life spans longer. With the convergence of technology and
medicine, there is practically no common illness we cannot stop. Lives are
saved everyday. People rejoice because they are given the chance to live
longer. We have begun to feel so invincible that when it is really a
person's "time", we suddenly enter a crisis.
Through the years, we have found ways to keep the body fit and active
through artificial means. These means, however, require money to be used. I
believe, that this is the reason why euthanasia began. Artificial life
supports give us hope, but when all our money is gone, we have nothing else
to do but "pull the plug". Hospitals should be more lenient with the money
they force people to pay. Of course, they have to make a living, but they
must also do their job. Hospitals were made to make people's lives longer,
not more miserable.
Some people think that euthanasia is a way to end one's suffering.
Don't we all suffer? Its not just as most people try to hide their
sufferings and our conditions are not emphasized because we are "normal".
Besides, wouldn't you make a person suffer even more if you deprive him of
his basic needs? Forcibly stopping someone from getting food and water is
one of the most horrible things you can do. These are patients, not
prisoners of war!
Euthanasia is a very fragile issue, and there are many different
factors to be considered when the act is being planned. But, no matter how
grave the circumstances may be, I hold firm to may stand on euthanasia. It
should not be done.
Death education is another related topic that also covers death.
Personally, I think death education is a good thing, as it teaches people
on how to deal with death and the like. However, death education, as far as
I can see, is coming out in extremes. Either it's being taught way too
deep, or not being taught at all.
As young kids, kids should be aware of how to react to death in a more
not-so-obvious manner. storytelling. Lots of tales have death in them, only
they're not so devastating because they're usually heroic. When they've
matured, sometime in the early teens, I think it is best to have death
education, not as a regular lesson, but as a seminar or something like
that. It is good to be made aware of death to be prepared for it when it
comes. Death is sometimes so alien to some people they are completely
shocked by it. Others see it so much from the wrong media they act as if
death is a normal day-to-day thing. Death education can be the means of
making people accept death. Through this, I think we can be really happy
that the ones who have passed away are truly in a happier place.