This will be a short sojourn into a heated debate that has raged for centuries. The issue of homosexual activity and its validation amongst normal human society. I simply ask to propose a simple question.

Now through the ages men and societies have tried to battle this issue with religion, morality and the norm of social conduct. However raw science is hardly ever brought into the equation, since not many people consider themselves scientists. My question however lies within this realm of acquired knowledge, human anatomy and what we now know of the supposed development of life on this planet. Now from what we know about the nature and its effects on our environment, I can simply state that it has one constant rule: to make more. That is nature’s sole purpose indeed within any environment one might come across. If you were to ask any naturalist this question most would readily agree. Now onto the focal point- if nature’s only purpose is to make more and heterosexuals fulfill this law, where does that leave homosexuals. Since its common knowledge that two members of the same gender cannot breed, what purpose do homosexuals serve in a scientific standpoint. Since nature advocates the rail against extinction, why would it implant such mindset of homosexuality into any organism. That would defeat its own purpose into creating more by intentionally creating an organism that went against its only law. That seems quite illogical by any perspective. So by this assertion wouldn’t that make homosexuality unnatural suggesting that such an act goes against the simplest of any cosmic law? Why would nature condone something that would inevitably lead to the extinction of life by not creating it? Derive what you will.