Share/Save/Bookmark
Home Just In Communities Forums Beta Readers Dictionary Search Login Register Extras
MrFlames's Forums » The Land of Flames Topic Subscription

Forums » The Land of Flames » Elite Essays
Author Post
MrFlames
Topic: Elite Essays
On my Clone, Le Creature, I created a C2 for the essay section. I don't want to add anything to it until there are at least three judges for inclusion into this category, and I don't want to make anyone a judge until they have stated their qualifications here. Only in this way will the C2 be different from someone's "favorite stories" page. If you would like to apply for a judge position, post your qualifications here.
#1 Oct 18th 2006, 11:13pm
No Trust
Qualifications: I believe you're familiar enough with me and my reviews to know that I'm a hard judge, but a fair one. That I'm far more impressed in factual accuracy and the proper use of logic than by whatever values a writer shares with me.

So I'm open if you can't find anyone better for the job.

#2 Oct 20th 2006, 9:58am
MrFlames
No Trust mentioned two essays on Radyn's list that seemed to be a suggestion. Of the two, the one on ID and evolution seemed to be much more rewarding: http://www.fictionpress.com/s/2127852/1/ He starts by explaining the problems with the debate in terms of semantics, and offers his own opinion that critical thinking rather than "truth" needs to be offered in classrooms. I disagree with some of his points, but I think I would agree that it's one of the better essays I've seen.

Vote 1 for inclusion in the Elite C2: Yes. [right now I'm thinking 3 votes should be needed for inclusion]

#3 Oct 20th 2006, 12:03pm
MrFlames
http://www.fictionpress.com/s/167631/1/

Currently, the first essay listed in the essay section, I think is still one of the few actually well-done "creative" essays out there. Preceding the "In soviet russia, x [verb]s y" meme, The Deacon's essay critiques passive living. It's not a formal essay, but it does have a more direct argument than most fiction. Plus, a lot of people don't go back and read the early essays.

Vote 1 for inclusion in the Elite C2: Yes

#4 Oct 20th 2006, 1:01pm
MrFlames
http://www.fictionpress.com/s/1146445/1/

Autumndark's "The Isolationist Manifesto" was one of the first "false voice exercises" to hit the essay section. More "famous" for working on The Writer's Attic, I think this essay is a better experiment in style and is more condusive to discussion then most of his/her other pieces. Autumndark isn't one of my favorite writers; one of the only reasons I noticed this essay was because for a while it was regularly one of the "featured links". For a piece in the first five pages of essays, it's one of the few with a distinctive voice and delibrate use of style. For me, that's enough to list it as a superior essay, although perhaps you won't agree that that's enough to make it elite.

Vote 1 for inclusion in the Elite C2: Yes

#5 Oct 20th 2006, 1:18pm
MrFlames
http://www.fictionpress.com/s/1147608/1/

A.E. White's "Letter to Terrorists" is far from the best written essay in the essay section. I even offer as a candidate not because of it's own merits, but because of it's nostalgic value in the essay section. It's not the first essay to deal explicitly about 9/11 (it's either the third or fourth, I think), but it's the first to do so quite so polemically, and also one of the first to result in an actual dialectic. The Shellback's review of the essay is almost as entertaining as the essay itself (although even less well thought out). Further, it's interesting looking at White's essay now, something like 5 years later.

I'm not actually going to vote yes on this one quite yet; I think it almost should be required reading, but maybe that would put it as a candidate for a different category of essay other than "elite".

#6 Oct 20th 2006, 1:23pm
MrFlames
http://www.fictionpress.com/s/1254714/1/

SqueezyStan's "Take Back Vermont" was pretty much the birth of the fictionpress pro-gay-marriage / anti-gay-marriage debate. Further, even though it's a fictitious-viewpoint experimental essay, it nonetheless presents a fair number of the arguments and criticisms of said arguments in perhaps their most coherent and clear form. It's filled with some over-the-top jabs ("Communism was the radical root of all evil, and, therefore, was the root of all the United States’ problems") and is far from a Swift-ian level of hiding one's real voice, but he also does his research for a few interesting points.

Not sure about this one; I'm trying to decide whether we'd want to include SqueezyStan's essay and Namir's 254 review bombshell, "Gay is Okay!" in the same list. I'm tempted to say: Yes.

#7 Oct 20th 2006, 1:37pm
Typewriter King
Whatever you come up with, I look forward to exploiting the XML feed.
#8 Oct 21st 2006, 10:39am
No Trust
(I will have to read the other suggested essays tomorrow.)

Vote #2 for inclusion in the Elite C2 of Biocube's essay "Intelligent Design and Creationism": Yes. The essay can be read at http://www.fictionpress.com/s/2127852/1/

#9 Oct 21st 2006, 10:08pm
Typewriter King
I'm not overqualified, and I've passed every reading comprehension test I've ever taken. I'm unmarried, if that helps. I own my own business (in the internet age, I guess we all can). I'm not affiliated with the Communist Party. I'm a registered voter. I've never filed a tax return. I've never solicitated a prostitute, but I'm hoping you won't hold that against me. You've favorited a lot of my works. A lot of internet memes such as the word "testering" originated from me.
#10 Oct 22nd 2006, 9:11am
Typewriter King
I hope you don't frown on my bullet point style of formatting.
#11 Oct 22nd 2006, 9:25am
MrFlames
Congratumacations, Typewriter King, you're now officially an Elite C2 Essay Judge! Go bake yourself half a ham sandwhich.
#12 Oct 22nd 2006, 1:00pm
No Trust
"The Isolationist Manifesto" by Autumndark

At first I disagreed with including this as an elite essay, though I remembered finding it amusing. However, on re-reading it today I've changed my mind. Assuming what I'm reading between the lines is not merely a Straussian hallucination, it seems to me now that the essay is far more clever than I originally gave it credit for.

By this as well as the style and voice already mentioned I judge this essay worthy of elite status.

Vote #2 for inclusion in the Elite C2: Yes

#13 Oct 22nd 2006, 2:58pm
No Trust
A.E. White's "Letter to Terrorists"

Whatever value this essay has for other reasons, it clearly does not merit elite status.

My vote for including it in the Elite C2: No.

#14 Oct 22nd 2006, 3:06pm
Typewriter King
Do I have to read everything you nominate?
#15 Oct 22nd 2006, 3:11pm
Typewriter King
Alright, Autumndark's message and his rhetorical methods don't resonate with me, but I can see why you want the essay included.
#16 Oct 22nd 2006, 3:24pm
MrFlames
Okay, this vote brings up an interesting point. I'm hoping to eventually get 5-6 judges for this project. Since not everyone will be able to vote on everything, I'm thinking entries will need a "3" score minimum for inclusion.

Thus:

"Yes" votes will equal 1 point.

"No" votes will equal -1 points.

Not voting will equal 0 points.

"Concessions" etc. like Typewriter King's should probably count as 0.

So Autumndark's piece right now is either at 2, unless Typewriter changes his mind.

#17 Oct 22nd 2006, 3:37pm
No Trust
"Take Back Vermont" by SqueezyStan

As far as I am concerned, SqueezyStan gets points for not trying to associate his assigned viewpoint with other views of the sterotypical right wing bigot. He could have done so and most people probably wouldn't have noticed. The essay itself is passable, however, none of his points are sufficiently connected or supported for me to consider the essay worthy of elite status. He relies on an unexplained assertion of a slippery slope, doesn't explain why federal law should aim to enforce religious doctrine (there are even orthodox arguments against doing so, e.g. the from the position that not all sins are crimes), and simply asserts that homosexual civil unions/marriages will weaken heterosexual marriages. In this he is certainly not *worse* than the typical author who actually shares the views his essay puts forth, but certainly these claims all have some kind of foundation or explanation that could have been included; these foundations may of course be wrong, and surely SqueezyStan would not be to blame if the foundations or explanations for the views are themselves shaky, as it is simply his job in this to present the best *possible* case for his assigned side of the issue. But given the absence of such explanations from the essay I'm really no more impressed by it than most of the later gay marriage essays.

Vote # 2 for inclusion in the Elite CS: No

#18 Oct 22nd 2006, 3:39pm
MrFlames
http://www.fictionpress.com/s/1257287/1/

"Gay is Okay!" by Namir Swiftpaw

Love it or hate it, "Gay is Okay!" by Namir Swiftpaw is probably the most influential essay on fictionpress. Namir not only increased overall interest in the gay marriage / anti-gay marriage debate, her essay is also probably the pinnacle of concise, effective arguments, with a clear tone, style, and voice. Not only that, but since it is a sincere opinion, Namir's essay is probably the best example of conveying sincere opinions effectively. Framing the essay with imagery, Namir introduces arguments against gay marriage, and then after providing effective rebuttals, introduces an argument for her viewpoint.

Vote #1 for inclusion in the Elite CS: Yes.

#19 Oct 22nd 2006, 3:51pm
Typewriter King
Biocube resorted to the "studies show" business I hate once, and made the controversial statement that Stephen Hawking is a deist without citing evidence for that dubious claim, but his piece was thoughtful enough for inclusion.
#20 Oct 22nd 2006, 3:51pm
No Trust
Do I have to read everything you nominate?

This is the land of do as you please.

#21 Oct 22nd 2006, 4:00pm
Le Creature
Biocube's essay, "Intelligent Design and Creationism", available at: http://www.fictionpress.com/s/2127852/1/ has achieved three "Yes" votes. It is now included in the C2. I will probably post something to the essay section, introducing the C2 and keeping a running commentary on successful and unsuccessful entries eventually.
#22 Oct 22nd 2006, 4:04pm . Edited Oct 22nd 2006, 4:05pm
Typewriter King
A.E. White's "Letter to Terrorists" shouldn't be included in a list for the elite. Even as a political speech, it would have a lot to be desired. I vote no for inclusion in the Elite C2, but if you make a list for provocative and nostalgic essays, I might change my vote.
#23 Oct 22nd 2006, 4:06pm
Typewriter King
'Gay Is Okay!' is a little more sentimental than rational. After all, marriage is a contract between two people, but Namir argues that it's about love. It doesn't seem like a compelling argument that love conquers other considerations for issuing licenses and contracts.

She rights "Another argument against homosexual marriage is that homosexual love is not “real” love" without ever giving a first reason, which is really sloppy. Read it carefully, there was no first reason given.

"Marriage as an institution has changed its definition of love over the years several times, anyway."

I don't know what that means. I've never heard of the government trying to define the meaning of the concept of love, and I've never heard of it written into a contract.

"Love between a man and a woman of a different race was prohibited until the 1960’s in the United States..."

No, interracial marriage was prohibited, and presumably sex was as well, but as she pointed out earlier, "love" is difficult to define. I don't like how she alternates the words marriage and love, inferring they have the same meaning.

In her conclusion, she doesn’t properly see the distinction between a right and a privilege, as something that’s actually a right wouldn’t need a government license for validation.

I can't cast a yes vote for inclusion into an elite group. It's charming, but mediocre.

#24 Oct 22nd 2006, 4:26pm
Typewriter King
"The Life and Times" by The Deacon reminds me of the things I didn't like about 'Fight Club' and 'American Beauty.'I don't see repititions about emptiness as beautiful the way some people do. I'll abstain from voting.
#25 Oct 22nd 2006, 4:39pm
No Trust
"Gay Is Okay!" by Nami Swiftpaw

I have to vote no. Typwriter King summed up the problems I myself see with the essay.

#26 Oct 22nd 2006, 4:41pm
No Trust
"The Life and Times" by The Deacon

The 'essay' strikes me as silly and nonsensical. As a fan of bad jokes I like the choice of style (or would if the author was trying to be funny). But like Typewriter King I find myself unimpressed by the topic and fear I would not be able to properly gauge how 'good' it is. I won't vote on this one.

#27 Oct 22nd 2006, 4:45pm
MrFlames
So far, the voting seems to be going well. I just blew through 67 pages of essay lists, and the only one that caught my eye was Tiefling's "The Death Penalty: My Views"

http://www.fictionpress.com/s/1340255/1/

Tiefling's piece is a "for-school" essay which always makes them more tedious; however, she managed to argue her points concisely and effectively enough to be engaging. She starts out by identifying her perceptions of the primary justifications for "punishment" and then tried to identify which form of punishment the death penalty is supposed to entail. Most of it focuses on Deterrence, and why the Death Penalty isn't effective. Her humanist arguments sometimes lead to a few less than stellar arguments, and the ending deals with her personal values, but overall the tone and style is effective. In addition to being one of the first essay to deal with the death penalty, I also think this is one of the first to effectively use secondary sources.

Vote for inclusion: Yes.

#28 Oct 22nd 2006, 5:30pm
No Trust
"The Death Penalty: My Views" by Tiefling

I took a liking to this essay's voice. In any essay dealing with whether something should or should not be done, the moral values of the writer (or the moral values they are wearing for the purposes of the writing exercise) are going to be the grounds for much of the argument. Tiefling is not as up front about hers as she could be but does not seem to try to hide behind a veil of faux-objectivity. I detect no arguments in the essay that are invalid in the context of their premises, no premises that are obviously false, and no significant empirical errors.

I vote: Yes.

#29 Oct 24th 2006, 1:16am
No Trust
I'm hoping to eventually get 5-6 judges for this project.

Are you sure there are even that many fictionpress authors that qualify?

#30 Oct 24th 2006, 1:28am
MrFlames
I was holding out hope that a few would come out of the woodwork.
#31 Oct 26th 2006, 7:33pm
No Trust
If there's anyone whose judgment you're specifically interested in you should probably contact them and let them know about the forum.
#32 Oct 27th 2006, 12:33am
Formerly
I suppose I'd be up for it, though I can't promise that I'll always make it on time. My only qualification is that at the moment I'm probably the most hated writer on Fictionpress--at least, definitely in the essay section (I don't venture into the others except when I can't find any inspiring essays, so I guess there might be other awesomely hated people around in poetry or something). I'm probably pretty high up in the "makes people fall for really bad and obvious sarcasm" list too, if that helps.
#33 Oct 31st 2006, 8:55pm
Biocube
I'll be one if you need more people.

My qualifications...well...I'm just about 7 months away from a bachleors degree.

By the way, thanks for all the kind words.

#34 Nov 10th 2006, 5:10pm
MrFlames
Krugman and Biocube, congratumacations, you're judgified.
#35 Nov 10th 2006, 8:40pm
tofujunky
I don't mean to brag, but I have killer knockers and a fantastic fanny. That on its own should qualify me. Also, I'm often told how incredibly intellectually competent I am. Mostly by the mentally deficient, whom I show great support to by not dismissing their agreeable opinions of me.

** and wits: a combination of pure awesomeness!

#36 Nov 14th 2006, 11:39pm
MrFlames
Indeed. Tofunky shall be allowedeth to vote, because she is a woman, and let's face it, unless Tiefling is reanimated from the bowels of Australia... . Although, I don't know, maybe she is tooooo funky...
#37 Nov 15th 2006, 12:13am
MrFlames
Also, people, please, let's get some more submissions.
#38 Nov 15th 2006, 12:14am
No Trust
Yeah, let's have some more submissions. And also, voting on some of the stuff that's been submitted but only weighed by one or two judges.
#39 Nov 15th 2006, 7:44pm
MrFlames
Has anyone read any good essays recently? Also, did anyone else want to apply for another judge position?
#40 Apr 03rd 2007, 3:47pm
No Trust
Biocube's latest essay is probably the best one published recently. I'm bordering on considering it elite, but I have a few reservations.
#41 Apr 04th 2007, 8:51am
MrFlames
It's the only one to make anything resembling a general argument lately that is at all coherent. However, I also have serious reservations about making it elite.
#42 Apr 04th 2007, 10:53am
MrFlames
http://www.fictionpress.com/s/2429034/1/

We have consistently refrained from including essays for style and structure, but I still feel its worth discussing them. It's funny, it makes me laugh, and some of the structural elements could be noted if I felt like it.

#43 Oct 24th 2007, 7:48pm
No Trust
Dear God. I vote yea.
#44 Oct 24th 2007, 9:55pm
Biocube
I still stand by everything that I said in the Shakespeare essay, if that is what you people are referring to. And of course, I'm not going to give a vote for it, since it's my own.
#45 Oct 28th 2007, 7:35pm
No Trust
Honestly, I'm sympathetic to the general thesis of the Shakespeare vs. Rowling essay (that literary snobbery is unjustified), I just think it's a mistake to devalue what you call 'verbal music'. (Yes, this is me, Mr. Anti-poet, saying this). I disagree with a sharp distinction between 'reason' and 'emotion'. Properly conceived, 'feelings' are part of our rational faculties.
#46 Oct 29th 2007, 1:39am
tofujunky
On "On the Case of Unfemininity", I vote aye.

And it better counts as a whole vote and not one-tenth of a vote!

#47 Nov 04th 2007, 8:03pm
NathanDavis
Qualifications: I have two. I'm very well-read (I has t3h smarts) and I'm extremely biased against other people's politcal views. Most people don't consider that second one a good quality, but I do.
#48 Dec 28th 2007, 2:22am

Moderator(s): MrFlames, The Fictionpress Historian, Le Creature,
Rule(s):
  1. Forums are not to be used to post stories.
  2. All discussions, language and content, must be suitable for teens.
  3. The owner/moderator(s) of this forum is solely responsible for content posted within this area.
  4. All forum abuse must be reported to the moderator(s).
Members:
  1. Forum admin/moderator
  2. Fanatic (on site for more than 2 years)
  3. Fan (on site for more than a year)
  4. Regular (on site for more than 6 months)
  5. Camper (on site for more than a month)
  6. Apprentice (on site for more than a week)
  7. Newbie (on site for less than a week)

All times are GMT -8, US Pacific Time Zone.
Return to Top