|
|
| Home Just In Communities Forums Beta Readers Dictionary Search | Login Register Extras |
| Kumquat21's Forums » Mlle Kumquat's Enlightened Salon |
|
|
|||
| Author | Post | ||
I came across an interesting bit in a blog about the readability of a writer's prose. It's far too long to post in this forum, so here's the gist of it: Some guy took ten bestselling novels, one each by Fannie Flagg, Kaye Gibbons, John Grisham, Jan Karon, Stephen King, Elmore Leonard, Terry McMillan, Anna Quindlen, Danielle Steel, and Wallace Stegner. And then he ran them through his grammar checker to find out what the Flesch-Kincaid scale said about them. The average score in four separate categories was as follows: The amount of passive voice the writers used ranged from 2.3% to 13.43%. The number of characters per word ranged from 3.72 to 4.58. The readability ranged from 72.34% to 91.84%, with an average of 83.1%. On the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scale, the range was 2.68 to 6.3, with an average grade level of 4.4. I guess he found that the bestselling writers were aiming their prose, prose that is read by a majority of adult readers in the country, at a fourth grade level. So he created his Ideal Writing Standard and said that from now on, he revises all his work to the following four standards PER ANY SCENE: No more than 4.25 characters per word. No more than 5% passive voice No less than an 80% readability on the Flesch Reading Ease scale. A Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level of 5. Okay, I wasn't just going to accept this without testing my own writing. Now here's my scores for the only two chapters of my recently deleted story One Night Run: Characters per word: 4.4 Passive voice: 3% Flesch Reading Ease score: 81.5 Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 4.7 So what do you all think of this? It's suprising how close my scores are to those above. Then again, I write like that on purpose, so maybe it shouldn't be. Anyway, I'm not taking it as gospel or anything, and I know writing is about far more than statistics, but I think its at least worth considering. Why don't you all take a chapter from your best story and run it through the same test? Its in Microsoft Word if you have it. Post your stats here.
|
|||
Oh son of a bitch. I have MS Word version 5.0?
|
|||
|
|||
Passive voice: 2% Flesch reading ease: 77.4% Flesch-Kincaid grade level: 4.7 Man I think I kind of blow..
|
|||
I get Chars 4.2 Passive 4% Flech 74.9% Grade 5.9% So I'm close but no cigar.
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah, I'd love to know where to find this, as well.
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Characters: 4.2 Passive Sentences:3% Reading Ease:77.3% Grade Level: 4.8 I kinda thought the grade level would be higher, but that's just my ego, I suppose.
|
|||
Yeah, when my other computer was working, (and I had word) I used to get 4.0s and 3.5's all the time, and think . . . -___________- "oh."
|
|||
Cellophane Girl*: Characters - 3.8 Passive Voice - 7% Reading Ease - 75.9 Grade Level - 7.7 *not yet posted if you were wondering Number 43: The Decisions of the Decider: Characters - 5.1/ 5.0 Passive Voice - 13%/ 14% Reading Ease - 36.9/ 34.4 Grade Level - 12.9/ 14.9 (Full Draft/ Body Only) Other Papers: Characters - 4.4 (4.2-4.6) Passive Voice - 19% (10-28%) Reading Ease - 61.3 (57.4-66.3) Grade Level - 10.1 (9.5-10.7) [Mean (Range)]
|
|||
|
|||
According to the results, my story Most Loving Mere Folly is perfectly salable. Characters per word: 4.2 Passive Voice: 0% (I didn't believe it either) Flesch Reading Easy score: 81.7 Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 4.5 I guess people won't mind the metafictional aspect of it.
|
|||
|
|||
Characters per word: 4.3 Words per sentence: 10.9 Passive sentences: 5% Reading ease: 71.8 Grade level: 5.9
|
|||
|
|||
Characters per word: 3.7 Passive Voice: 4% Flesch Reading Ease: 91.4 (Wow...) Flesch-Kincaid Reading Level: 2.5 (And then the grade level for Chapter One jumps to 6.2...)
|
|||
Characters per word: 4.4 Passive Sentences: 6% Flesch Reading Ease: 65.8 Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 7.2
|
|||
| Moderator(s): | |
| Rule(s): |
|
| Members: |
|