If people cannot post like that, they can settle with just posting the link. AVOID THE HTML EDITOR! Such a waste of time.

Frac, in my previous post (here in P/Q) i used the code for greater/less than for the link. it works the same as you would type it in HTML editor and it involves no clicking.

(& l t ;)a href="http://www.fictionpress.com/~silv3rdr34ms"(& g t ;)My Profile(& l t ;)/a(& g t ;)

replace all the (& l t ;) and (& g t ;) with what is in the parenthesis without the spaces. You should have a working link when you post AFTER you have hit the 'Site Preview' Button on the bottom left hand corner of the post editor...upon hitting that button, the link should look as such: My Profile

I added it but couldnt figurei t out myself...

frac, i edited my post above yours. take out this line from the RM:

"When you initially post, the code will NOT work. Once you EDIT your post again, it will work."

Change it to:

'Click on the 'Site Preview' Button and the link will work properly.'

(or something to that effect)

Way ahead of you.

As I was on the second to last post on the previous page :P

TOO SLOW, LIME! TOO SLOW!

haha...anyway, your RM post disagrees..

you want to use Narc's Roanoke as the example? change the link url and description. it SHOULD read:

(& l t ;)a href="http://www.fictionpress.com/s/2298190/1/Roanoke"(& g t ;)Roanoke(& l t ;)/a(& g t ;)

But its YOUR awesome code, so I want it to be your profile :P

ok..fine.

:( Why are you bothered by it?

i'm bothered by it because you were talking about Roanoke for the linking example, and then you switch the link to have it direct to my profile (in the example code). it feels like it's thrown in there...but don't worry about it. if that's how you want it, it's fine. =)

-- OFF TOPIC --

OMFG...it is COLD in this place...no, FREEZING!

-- END OFF TOPIC --

I thought that might be it so i have already edited way before this post's existance the reason why you are thrown into it

I am always one step ahead! :D Mwahahahha! I will be a fierce lawyer!

NOOOOO!!!!

"This must be done in the HTML editor:"

NOOO!!!!

This is done in the regular POST editor...just in your post! it does NOT require you to edit in the HTML editor..my point was to avoid that! ><

calm down you hissy kitty. RM isnt until the end of the month. keep your panties in a bunch

*cough*

sorry...i just wanted to point it out so as to not confuse people further..

Ah... [feeling retarded...]

So, when's the poll going to be over at the off-topic? I wanna see the results!

As soon as I get 25 votes for it. This epic poll needs epic participation. Especially since I put such effort into it. APPRECIATE!

Currently: 19 votes

So... 6 votes away?

That'll be over in no time at all...

Wait, do we even have 25 members?

I got 30 votes on the last poll, so I figured 25 was no biggie

Btw, we are at 21 now :3

Really?

Wow. [amazed]

And your avatar really makes me feel...

[happy]

Okay, dont really know where else to put this and announce, but here it goes: Read This First! has gotten a new section called Punishments. Just wanted to make you all aware of this.

Why didn't you put your other question up here?

(About RG missing something.....)

That question was only meant to get a feel of things. Not really official business. I could indeed use this topic for it, though.

That question was only meant to get a feel of things. Not really official business.

Ah.....

Even so, if it could somehow improve the overall RG experience, why not post it here?

As you said:

I could indeed use this topic for it, though.

For that poll going on in the Suggestion topic, how many options do you all think should be in the actual poll thats discussed in the Sug topic? 5? 10? 200?

Again, I would put this question in the Sug top (as it is a suggestion for how much to have) but I dont want to ruin the flow.

I say we could get away with 15 as max. I'd want to try having 15 too.

I say we could get away with 15 as max. I'd want to try having 15 too.

Is that the max that a poll can have?

Whatever that number is, make that the poll....

No. What I meant with "get away" was thats as high of a number we can have before people will be seriously FRACed off at having to scroll down the poll to get to the page :p

Oh. And:

Each poll can have have up to 100 choices.

PICK AND CHOOSE!

Each poll can have have up to 100 choices.

Really?

Then make the poll something like 20.....

okay. here we go... some randomly thought up questions about the RG...

how are we going to get people to actually GIVE the prize reviews during the RM? we banned a lot of people last time. T_T

and... have we decided when the RM is going to be? and when are we accepting registrations?

-Lefty

ps: yes, this was just to move the topic up. but i needed to have SOMETHING to ask about... XD

(for being a filler post, it sure was a good one! :D Not filler at all! As expected of my chosen one)

1. I have ZERO clue. I was hoping we could fix it by limiting the registration time. Perhaps...we should make it more apparent in the first post that you will get banned if you don't review them? So people don't take it lazily? I have avoided doing so so far because I thought it'd be intimidating.

2. seems to be the latest date. I think I will make it official + accept registrations one week in advance. Or is it too short?

(everyone's opinion on this + explanation to their standpoint would be lovely. Particularly if you play the RM)

ehehe... thank you. :)

1. yeah, limiting registration time is good. definitely go with one week in advance... or should we have them register on the day that they start reviewing? O.o? but then... we want people to see how many potential reviews they can get (# of participants) so i think one week before should work.

as for the rules... aaagh, i feel like if we add that into the rules, it's not going to do any good... (people don't really read the rules, i don't think. maybe we should put that in a poll: BE HONEST - DID YOU READ THE RULES BEFORE PLAYING???) maybe you can make a post after the rules post that tells people they MUST BE COMMITTED to giving a prize review if they want to register. maybe they have to include that in their registration blurb.

2. okay. :) that'll work better for me (i think) because i'll be out of school by then. maybe i'll actually be able to play this time around! :D

-Lefty

1. Okay, one week is settled! :D Now for me to figure out when that date is :p

I should totally make a poll about "did you read the rules before playing?". I'd be interested in the results. I like the committed part too in the rules... Perhaps I should add that to registration requirement?

2. Wowie! :D This gonna be epic.

(do I have to go to sug topic and make rule-adding-of-committment a sug or just do it?)

yes... please make a poll. you could make it in both the RM and RG, if you were REALLY curious... XD but i think RM might be enough.

i would definitely add to the registration requirement... umm... if you want to suggest it, that's fine (but i'll just second it, so that's pointless-ish) but we could just... go dictator. just this once? XD

-Lefty

//Semi-spam, I know this isbetter left to the sugg topic\\

What's the next OT going to be called?

Also, is there going to be a new poll?

//Semi-spam, I know this isbetter left to the sugg topic\\

Here's a question for ya: Then why don't you post it there? Hmm?

What's the next OT going to be called

I don't know. Go to the sug topic

Also, is there going to be a new poll?

I don't know. Go to the sug topic

I posted my semi-spam to move the last OT down further..... duhh!

It was already down.

I know this because last message here before you spammed was made Yesterday, 2:55 pm. But the Locked Off Topic was made Yesterday, 2:24pm.

This means Lefty's post came after the topic was locked. Also means this topic was above the locked topic, and that your post was PURE spamming. Not that it's a surprise...

Also means this topic was above the locked topic, and that your post was PURE spamming.

Not really, this one was still below 7th heaven... At least I thought it was....

I could be wrong, though....

[I think I'll just stop now, to keep frac from trying to kill me....]

Just read the banned notice.....

But! But! But! Will he EVER be let back????!!!!????? EVER??!!!!!!!!

Is your question if the ban for disobedience of moderators an infinite punishment or not? Because if it is, I don't know... We have never had to ban someone for this before, so we haven't had to think about it...

Lefty. We should probably decide something.

Yes, that is my question.......................

Either way, though, I don't think you should be expecting him back soon. This has been repeated offense, and he hasn't really shown much maturity growth to us, so it will be a longer punishment either way.

hmmm... we should decide something.

problem is, i never expected to run into this problem.

-Lefty

Me neither.

1 month should be bare minimum, but I don't even know if that's enough. Wait, I'll move this to sug topic..

1. Forums are not to be used to post stories.
2. All discussions, language and content, must be suitable for teens.
3. The owner/moderator(s) of this forum is solely responsible for content posted within this area.
4. All forum abuse must be reported to the moderator(s).

1. Forum admin/moderator
2. Fanatic (on site for more than 2 years)
3. Fan (on site for more than a year)
4. Regular (on site for more than 6 months)
5. Camper (on site for more than a month)
6. Apprentice (on site for more than a week)
7. Newbie (on site for less than a week)