Hello!

I'd just like to say that I am not a writer, but only a reader and reviewer. I mostly enjoy stories in the romance and humour genre.

My reviews usually fall into a category:

1. Short, simple and express that I like a story

2. Short and express what I like and minor points that I don't like about a story

3. Long-winded and express what I like about a story and the emotions evoked by said story.

4. Contains a question which usually means: I've missed a fact/that the author needs to address the factors based in the question in their story because it is unclear/that the story doesn't make sense with contradicting factors.

5. Long/Short saying how/where the author can improve their story.

OR I can not review at all after reading the first few chapters of a story, because it has failed to keep me interested.

OR the story is of an OK standard

I tend to only review when I like a story or when it's dreadful, but short and I can force myself to read through a story and help point out areas that need improvement.

And yes, for a non-author I tend to talk a lot.

Yes. I also like sarcasm.

I also like full stops.

They seem so dramatic and point-blank (pun not intended, but can be enjoyed anyway).

Bye.

Oh and Elle Winters is not my name either.

Neither is Elle Winters 9. Just in case you couldn't figure that fact by yourself. It's ok. =)