Annette: You are mine. Just so you and Dean know. ….And anyone else!

Yesterday, at 19:25 . Comment . Like. See Wall-to-Wall


Annette: You are mine. Just so you and Dean know. ….And anyone else!

Yesterday, at 19:25 . Comment . Like. See Wall-to-Wall

Marie: Nice, I like it!

Yesterday at 19:31


Annette: You are mine. Just so you and Dean know. ….And anyone else!

Yesterday, at 19:25 . Comment . Like. See Wall-to-Wall

Marie: Nice, I like it!

Yesterday at 19:31

Dean: woah…woah…WOAH….i called dibs a while ago and as the international dibs rules states.. once dibs has been claimed no one but the dibber may undue the dibs.

Yesterday at 21:54


Annette: You are mine. Just so you and Dean know. ….And anyone else!

Yesterday, at 19:25 . Comment . Like. See Wall-to-Wall

Marie: Nice, I like it!

Yesterday at 19:31

Dean: woah…woah…WOAH….i called dibs a while ago and as the international dibs rules states.. once dibs has been claimed no one but the dibber may undue the dibs.

Yesterday at 21:54

Annette: but did you say it on FB? Ah-NO. Win.

Yesterday at 22:10


Annette: You are mine. Just so you and Dean know. ….And anyone else!

Yesterday, at 19:25 . Comment . Like. See Wall-to-Wall

View all four comments

Annette: but did you say it on FB? Ah-NO. Win.

Yesterday at 22:10

Dean: January 8 at 4:12 I did look.

Yesterday at 22:13


Dean: dibs…. i called it

08 January at 16:12 . Comment . Like . See Wall-to-Wall

Dean likes this


Dean: dibs…. i called it

08 January at 16:12 . Comment . Like . See Wall-to-Wall

Dean likes this

Annette: ITS ALL LIES!!!!!!

Yesterday at 22:16


Dean: dibs…. i called it

08 January at 16:12 . Comment . Like . See Wall-to-Wall

Dean likes this

Annette: ITS ALL LIES!!!!!!

Yesterday at 22:16

Annette: and you never defined what 'dibs' are. Without definitions you failed in your burden and then cannot win on a before case issue.

Yesterday at 22:18


Dean: dibs…. i called it

08 January at 16:12 . Comment . Like . See Wall-to-Wall

Dean likes this

Annette: ITS ALL LIES!!!!!!

Yesterday at 22:16

Annette: and you never defined what 'dibs' are. Without definitions you failed in your burden and then cannot win on a before case issue.

Yesterday at 22:18

Dean: next time you should as for clarification in a POI before to refute the lack of evidence if the content was questionable then clarification before argumentation must be had or else you have wasted valuable posts and thusly ruined the ability for us to have an educational squabble over maria … Wanna play debate I'll play debate.

Yesterday at 22:21


Dean: dibs…. i called it

08 January at 16:12 . Comment . Like . See Wall-to-Wall

View all four comments

Dean likes this

Dean: next time you should as for clarification in a POI before to refute the lack of evidence if the content was questionable then clarification before argumentation must be had or else you have wasted valuable posts and thusly ruined the ability for us to have an educational squabble over maria … Wanna play debate I'll play debate.

Yesterday at 22:21

Annette: its not my fault you did not take the two seconds it would have been to clarify. As it stands Maria is mine and you have something named 'Dibs' (which is an awesome icecream treat)

Yesterday at 22:23


Dean: dibs…. i called it

08 January at 16:12 . Comment . Like . See Wall-to-Wall

View all five comments

Dean likes this

Annette: its not my fault you did not take the two seconds it would have been to clarify. As it stands Maria is mine and you have something named 'Dibs' (which is an awesome icecream treat)

Yesterday at 22:23

Dean: as it stands Annette decided to claim maria without properly researching any background. And upon finding that someone had claimed her with dibs. Decided to ignore that form of claiming (aka interpretation) instead vouching for a more direct form. But did so without any standards or justification to stand upon besides the lack of clarification. It wasn't until the 3rd on topic post until a counter interpretation for dibs was revealed… yet again no reason to hold that interpretation over the original. This poorly structured offense against a clearly war warrented dibs yields no stable advocacy nor justification and thusly need not be taken into account when determining who has rightfully claimed maria.

Yesterday at 22:30


Dean: dibs…. i called it

08 January at 16:12 . Comment . Like . See Wall-to-Wall

View all six comments

Dean likes this

Dean: as it stands Annette decided to claim maria without properly researching any background. And upon finding that someone had claimed her with dibs. Decided to ignore that form of claiming (aka interpretation) instead vouching for a more direct form. But did so without any standards or justification to stand upon besides the lack of clarification. It wasn't until the 3rd on topic post until a counter interpretation for dibs was revealed… yet again no reason to hold that interpretation over the original. This poorly structured offense against a clearly war warrented dibs yields no stable advocacy nor justification and thusly need not be taken into account when determining who has rightfully claimed maria.

Yesterday at 22:30

Annette: we need to look at this big picture style. Annette claims Maria by saying "Mine" Dean 'claims' to have claimed Maria by saying "Dibs", However if Annette's post is looked to next to Dean's post you find MARIA only commenting on one. Therefore agreeing by default. Maria has yet to post anything on yours. Score one for Peter. … …..or me.

Yesterday at 22:37


Annette: You are mine. Just so you and Dean know. ….And anyone else!

Yesterday, at 19:25 . Comment . Like. See Wall-to-Wall

View all five comments

Dean: January 8 at 4:12 I did look.

Yesterday at 22:13

Annette: WINNING

Yesterday at 22:53


Dean: dibs…. i called it

08 January at 16:12 . Comment . Like . See Wall-to-Wall

View all seven comments

Dean likes this

Annette: we need to look at this big picture style. Annette claims Maria by saying "Mine" Dean 'claims' to have claimed Maria by saying "Dibs", However if Annette's post is looked to next to Dean's post you find MARIA only commenting on one. Therefore agreeing by default. Maria has yet to post anything on yours. Score one for Peter. … …..or me.

Yesterday at 22:37

Dean: ahh but you see because there was no refutation on my claim of dibs the dibs did in fact flow through making it a pre existing precedent to your new emerging claim. And as of status quo we have dean with an un refuted claim of dibs and Annette with a well refuted claim attempting to nullify the dibs. Just because you lose the first argument doesn't warrant jumping to an even worse one =)

21 hours ago


Dean: dibs…. i called it

08 January at 16:12 . Comment . Like . See Wall-to-Wall

View all eight comments

Dean likes this

Dean: ahh but you see because there was no refutation on my claim of dibs the dibs did in fact flow through making it a pre existing precedent to your new emerging claim. And as of status quo we have dean with an un refuted claim of dibs and Annette with a well refuted claim attempting to nullify the dibs. Just because you lose the first argument doesn't warrant jumping to an even worse one =)

21 hours ago

Annette: your just jealous because she likes me more. And validated my claim. As you may notice all of Dean's refutation has been midigation agains Annette's valid points. Not points of his own. When looked at offense vs shittyness Annette is the clear winner.

10 hours ago


Dean: dibs…. i called it

08 January at 16:12 . Comment . Like . See Wall-to-Wall

View all nine comments

Dean likes this

Annette: your just jealous because she likes me more. And validated my claim. As you may notice all of Dean's refutation has been midigation agains Annette's valid points. Not points of his own. When looked at offense vs shittyness Annette is the clear winner.

10 hours ago

Maria: Um, anyone going to point out that Dean called me an "it"? That right there is an improper pronoun for a HUMAN BEING therefore, you could not have been referring to ME. Plus Annette actually capitalized my name in these posts, solidifying her win. Sorry dean, I love you, but Annette has dibs &-)

10 hours ago


Dean: dibs…. i called it

08 January at 16:12 . Comment . Like . See Wall-to-Wall

View all ten comments

Dean likes this

Maria: Um, anyone going to point out that Dean called me an "it"? That right there is an improper pronoun for a HUMAN BEING therefore, you could not have been referring to ME. Plus Annette actually capitalized my name in these posts, solidifying her win. Sorry dean, I love you, but Annette has dibs &-)

10 hours ago

Dean: to start with…. I referred to dibs as in called it (dibs.) but further more… I didn't want to have to do this but hey its 2v1. Dibs on Mnnette. …maria I will trade you my dibs on Annette for approval of my initial dibs on you.

9 hours ago


Dean: dibs…. i called it

08 January at 16:12 . Comment . Like . See Wall-to-Wall

View all eleven comments

Dean likes this

Dean: to start with…. I referred to dibs as in called it (dibs.) but further more… I didn't want to have to do this but hey its 2v1. Dibs on Mnnette. …maria I will trade you my dibs on Annette for approval of my initial dibs on you.

9 hours ago

Annette: FOUL: Dean implemented Plan without first having a Policy discussion on it. Plan greats MORE harms then the Status Quo, and so we should revert back to Annette having Maria, and Dean not having anyone.

2 hours ago