p class="Body" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; border: none; line-height: 32px;"Suppose you are the owner of a house with a pool, and a group of teenagers decided to climb over your backyard gate which you didn't really secure besides latching it. Besides it's not every day that a band of teenagers decide to invade your pool for a nice swim; However in the process they did tidy up your yard, that's a positive right? No, actually, most of us at least would scream intrusion, trespass, and call the police on these teenagers, and would not in fact welcome them in even if they do tidy up our yard. It's the same axioms at play here. Does it seem random? It isn't. According to the NAS the really stunning thing is that "research by the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA) done for the Department of Homeland Security indicates that 170,000 illegal immigrants crossed the border successfully without going through a port of entry in 2015." Trump is right to focus on a wall, because as in the El Paso section according to span style="color: #545454; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;"Victor M Manjarrez, /span "The border barriers had two primary functions: clearly delineate the international border in downtown El Paso, Texas and provide an obstacle for those entering the United States illegally" (330.) It serves similarly as a wall on our house with a door locked and our gates secured. Yes, you can voluntarily let those teens in, and for the United states we do infact unlock our gates and doors for people to come in by legal means of immigrations. This notion of a border wall isn't unique to trump, it was not his creation. according to Manjarrez "Physical pedestrian border barriers are designed to provide law enforcement increased time to respond to the entry before the illegal entrant vanishes within the legitimate activity on the U.S. side of the borders" 332.) This is a design to keep us safe and such a barrier will in fact deter and slow down flow across the border. Many act as if this was a new objectionable idea. We began this journey according to/p
p class="Body" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; border: none; text-align: center; line-height: 32px;" align="center"1/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; line-height: 29.3333px;"span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: #545454; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;"Patrick timmons /spanspan style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"with a "/spanspan style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"report, entitled The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society; had identified that most marijuana smuggled into the United States came from Mexico, and that interceptions of both "drugs and the people" could "reasonably be expected if the capacity to enforce customs law was increased." (6.) Not only was the border security a concern but fences and a physical border was thought of and proposed and some of it was already constructed under the George W Bush era. According to Manjarrez there was proposed in congress "/spanspan style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"legislation required the Secretary of DHS to build physical border infrastructure such as barriers, roads, and lighting. The aim by Congress was to prevent the unlawful entry of individuals into the United States (Public Law 109-367)" (337.) according to Manjarrez the main "aim is to achieve a high level of certainty of arrest" (341). according to /spanspan style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; color: #545454; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;"Peter Hays gries /spanspan style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"citizens opposed to illegal immigrations "Opponents of immigration frequently warn of a breakdown of public order" (36.) This was indeed true and is not just an opinion. The fact was that it did indeed according to Manjarrez "reduced the quality of life for those residents who resided along the immediate border region in San Diego, California" (331,) because of border crossers and the chaos involved in this process. After a barrier was built the effects was felt immediately. The citizen's life improved and crime was lessened. According to Manjarrez "The most pronounced result was a clear indication that the tactics and strategy worked" (333). It works the same, here. The man who proposed a border wall and his administration helped this country be more secure. According to the heritage foundation "2017 saw border crossings fall to their lowest level since 1971, thanks to the Trump administration's policies. But there are still hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants trying to cross into the U.S. the side effect may be to stress and anger normal people who are genuinely trying to cross the border legally, but for sure it deters and frustrates the efforts of illegal immigrants because there would be "long wait/span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; text-align: center; line-height: 29.3333px;" align="center"span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"2/span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; line-height: 29.3333px;"span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"times in traffic or pedestrian lines; severe U.S. Customs inspections; the presence of electronic and aerial surveillance, dogs, and armed Border Patrol agents increasing in number along the border; and, of course, fencing and walls" (2). This way they couldn't easily get passed and if attempted they would be caught. they would be forced to get in by a more remote place and at that point hopefully they could be caught after being deterred by a wall with surveillance. This is better with our neighbors because we are clear with them where our territory is and where theirs are. Also It serves to not allow their countries and their chaos to flow over to us. It's a reminder that they can not let their citizens cross readily over our borders./span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; line-height: 29.3333px;"span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 32px; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" Besides this we know that according to NAS "There is also agreement that immigrants who come to America with modest levels of education create significantly more in costs for government than they pay in taxes" and we know that illegal crossers have the fewest years of formal education. According to NAS this is because "/spanspan style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"Illegal crossers tend to be the least educated component of illegal immigration because they are mostly from Latin America and because more educated foreign nationals wishing to come to the United States can often qualify for a temporary visa." This is actually not just an opinion because according to NAs "there is a good deal of evidence that they have modest levels of education, much lower than native-born Americans or legal immigrants. The Heritage study discussed above estimated that, on average, illegal immigrants have 10 years of schooling." This is an important issue to us or should be because we should be able to work with the other countries to determine immigration patterns and who we allow to immigrate in to our country. While we want a good relationship with them we also don't need their country and their citizens to overrun our country and let our country be an extension of theirs./span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; line-height: 29.3333px;"span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" While the wall is great there should be more that is done, we could spend money also on on technology or additional agents would could respond to and detect illegal crossings" A wall is a good start but not the end all of it all of the solution according to the heritage foundation. Also it is noted that/span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; text-align: center; line-height: 29.3333px;" align="center"span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"3/span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; line-height: 29.3333px;"span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"according to the heritage foundation they suggest that "This holistic approach of combining barriers, technology, and people is the cost-effective way to secure the border. Build "the wall" is not enough." The wall can be broken and what happens when they cross over the wall? It is harder and it slows down the attempt but if someone is so inclined they can do this. according to heritage foundation "Once an illegal immigrant is picked up at the border, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers and immigration courts must actually remove the illegal immigrant. Border security is only as good as the enforcement that backs it up."/span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; line-height: 29.3333px;"span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" This policy in general as shown will keep americans safer including myself. What does this policy have to do with me and normal citizens? Only this, it will make all the differnce. In the case of San diego it is demonstrated that it keeps the citizens safer and the crimes down. It has also been shown that crimes will go down because of what comes accross the border. Also according to the NAS research we could also cut down on welfare and those immigrant families who need to be on government assistance. There will still of course be immigrant families who need it but by and large the most uneducated immigrants will be fewer. This will drain our swamp slower. This should be a big concern for me, you, and everyone else who lives in our nation. We don't need such concerns to worry about./span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; line-height: 29.3333px;"span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" The problem with this policy is that it is unlikely to be a very short term project and is dependent on the next president at least to complete it. Even if we do give President Trump the benefit of the doubt that he may win 2020. Building this wall is a lengthy, and arduous process, and will take up a lot of financial resources which the congress and senate will have to approve. That will take some time as well. So, no it won't probably be completed in Trump's presidency especially if he loses the 2020 elections./span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; line-height: 29.3333px;"span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" /span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; line-height: 29.3333px;"span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" /span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; line-height: 29.3333px;"span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" /span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; line-height: 29.3333px;"span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" /span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; line-height: 29.3333px;"span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" /span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; line-height: 29.3333px;"span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" /span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; line-height: 29.3333px;"span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" /span/p
p class="Default" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; border: none; text-align: center; line-height: 29.3333px;" align="center"span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"4/span/p